Which of these is NOT a recognized decision-making style?

The decision-making styles recognized in various frameworks typically include rational, intuitive, and authoritative approaches.

The rational decision-making style involves a systematic process where decisions are made based on logic and careful analysis of relevant information. This process often includes defining the problem, gathering information, evaluating alternatives, and choosing the most effective option based on objective metrics.

The intuitive style reflects a more instinctual approach where decisions are made based on gut feelings, past experiences, and instincts rather than a structured analysis of data. This can be particularly effective in situations where quick decisions are necessary or where data is incomplete.

Authoritative decision-making is generally understood as a style where a leader or figure with experience dictates the decisions, usually taking into account their knowledge and judgment to guide the outcome.

On the other hand, the hesitant style is not acknowledged as a formal category within decision-making approaches. Instead, hesitation is often viewed as a potential barrier or a weakness that might reflect indecisiveness rather than a style characterized by a specific methodology or framework. Recognizing this distinction clarifies why hesitant is not considered a recognized decision-making style.